Premial law: admissibility of collaboration awarded as a mechanism for obtaining proof and its practical reflexes in the angolan criminal justice system

Abstract

Throughout world history, a search for the truth of facts has always demonstrated a relevant character in the application of justice, but obtaining a truth of any fact is not a simple task. There are several legal institutes that have the status to obtain the truth of the facts, among them the awarded collaboration. The truth of the facts proves to be important in any legal field, but especially in criminal law and procedural law, given the importance of the protected legal law. We believe that the award-winning collaboration is of the importance of criminal justice since, given the complexity of certain criminal articulations, the elucidation of criminal practice becomes equally complex, so it seems undeniable by investing in confession and information. that help to clarify the criminal offense, as a criminal practice is often surrounded by details of difficult elucidation: operation, composition, organization, hierarchy among other details. However, an award-winning collaboration is not a means of proof and must always be confronted and confirmed with the evidence of the process. It is not enough to blame the indicators. It is a means, a proof test technique. In this paper, we will make a brief general introduction to prize law (prize-winning collaboration), we will briefly summarize award-winning collaboration in substantive and adjective (general) law, we will also mention the international standards that host the institute, and finally we will use to address a procedural collaboration in the homeland legal system.