Apropiación Nacional de las Nociones de Ciudadanía y Paz a la Luz de la Agenda Internacional en el Contexto de la Posguerra Civil en Angola
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54580/R0502.02Palavras-chave:
Agenda internacional, Propiedad nacional, Ciudadanía, Guerra civil, PazResumo
Este estudio, que tiene como problemática la repolitización de los conceptos de ciudadanía y paz y su uso analítico conjunto, pretende mostrar en qué medida la apropiación nacional de las nociones de “ciudadanía” y “paz” está condicionada por la agenda internacional. tras el fin de la guerra civil en Angola en 2002. Este estudio es de enfoque cualitativo, de carácter teórico, desarrollado a través de una investigación bibliográfica exploratoria. Los resultados indican que, en Angola, la apropiación del término “paz” se asocia a la apropiación del término “ciudadanía” sólo después del final de la guerra civil y, desde un punto de vista instrumental, gana cierta importancia después del nacimiento. de una nueva jurisdicción constitucional que cambia varias de las reglas políticas del país y posiciona al ciudadano en una inmensa esfera de espacios públicos, pero condicionada por la agenda internacional. De estos resultados, concluimos que, en el contexto de posguerra, existen más continuidades que rupturas en relación con la necesidad de apropiación endógena de los conceptos de ciudadanía y paz y de profundización del posicionamiento de los actores nacionales y locales dentro del marco de la posguerra. dimensión del Estado-nación.
Downloads
Referências
Brahimi, L. (2007). State building in crisis and post-conflict countries. In 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Building Trust in Government (pp. 26-29). Viena: s/e.
Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development. Putting the last first. London: Pearson.
Chandler, D. (2005). Introduction: peace without politics. In International Peacekeeping (pp. 307-321), n. º 12 (3).
Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in denial. The politics of state-building. London: Pluto Press.
Chandler, D. (2010). International state-building: the rise of post-liberal governance. Abingdon: Routledge.
Chesterman, S. (2007). Ownership in theory and in practice: transfer of authority in UN State building operations. In Journal of intervention and state building (pp. 3-26), n. º 1 (1).
Cornwall, A. (2002). Making spaces, changing places: situating participation traditional peacebuilding. In Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding (347-366). London: Macmillan.
Donais, T. (2012). Peace building and local ownership. Post-conflict consensus-building. Conflict, development and peace building. London: Routledge.
Eyben, R., e Ladbury, S. (2006). Building effective states: taking a citizen’s perspective. In Development Research Centre on Citizenship, Participation and Accountability (s/p). Brighton: s/e.
Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: the politics of alternative development, Oxford: Blackwell.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building, governance and world order in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.
Goldschmidt, V. (1963). Tempo lógico e tempo histórico na interpretação dos sistemas filosóficos: a religião de Platão. São Paulo: Difusão Europeia do Livro.
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hughes, C., e Pupavac, V. (2005). Framing post-conflict societies: international in development. In Institute of Development Studies Working (s/pp). Brighton: s/e.
Ki-Moon, B. (2009). Report of the Secretary-General on peacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict. New York: UN A/63/881-S/2009/304.
Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Gilding the lily? International support for indigenous and pathologisation of Cambodia and the post Yugoslav States. In Third World Quarterly (pp. 873-889), n.º 26 (6).
Mac Ginty, R., e RichmonD, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: a critical agenda for peace. In Third World Quarterly (pp. 763-783), n. º 34 (5). Paper n.º 170.
Narten, J. (2009). Dilemmas of promoting “local ownership”: the case of postwar Kosovo. In R. Paris e T. D. Sisk (orgs.). The dilemmas of state building: confronting the contradictions of post-War peace operations (pp. 252-283). Abingdon: Routledge.
Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end: building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paris, R., e Sisk, T. D. (2009). Introduction: understanding the contradictions of post-war state building. In R. Paris e T. D. Sisk (orgs.). The dilemmas of state building: confronting the contradictions of post-war peace operations (pp. 1-20). Abingdon: Routledge.
Pouligny, B. (2006). Peace operations seen from below: UN Missions and local people. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
Pouligny, B. (2009). Supporting local ownership in humanitarian action. In Global Public Policy Institute - Humanitarian Policy Paper Series. Berlin: AZ Druck und Datentechnik.
Ramsbotham, O., Miall, H., e Woodhouse, T. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution. (3.ª ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Reich, H. (2006). “Local ownership” in Conflict Transformation Projects. Partnership, Participation or Patronage? In Bergof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. Berlin: Occasional Paper.
Richmond, O. P., e Franks, J. (2009). Liberal peace transitions: between state building and peace building. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Schmitt, C. (2009). El Concepto de lo político. (trad. de R. Agapito). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
